Jump to content

The Astros' Owner and G.M. Have Long-Term Plans


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

o

 

The Astros are 14-10 over their last 24 games.

They are 19-17 over their last 36 games.

For many teams, that's not a big deal ........ but for the Astros, going 19-17 over a 36-game span means that they have held their own for almost 1/4 of the season.

THAT is a big deal.

 

http://espn.go.com/mlb/team/schedule/_/name/hou/houston-astros

 

*********************************

 

When the Astros started the season at 10-30 for a .250 winning percentage (the same as the 1962 Mets had for the entire year), I don't know many people that could have foreseen them going 19-17 over ANY stretch of this 2013 season.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Astros are 14-10 over their last 24 games.

They are 19-17 over their last 36 games.

For many teams, that's not a big deal, but for the Astros, going 19-17 over a 36-game span means that they have held their own for almost 1/4 of the season.

THAT is a big deal.

The 2004 Rays won 12 games in a row, but still finished 21 games below .500. I doubt if the 2013 Astros will better that record. They're 18 games below .500 right now.

I enjoy seeing the Astros beat up on teams like the Angels who thought they'd be pushovers, but it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 2004 Rays won 12 games in a row, but still finished 21 games below .500. I doubt if the 2013 Astros will better that record. They're 18 games below .500 right now.

I enjoy seeing the Astros beat up on teams like the Angels who thought they'd be pushovers, but it happens.

There was this guy who posted here who was going to lose $250k if they won like 59 games. I think. Maybe it was 49.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrant Redbird said:

 

The 2004 Rays won 12 games in a row, but still finished 21 games below .500. I doubt if the 2013 Astros will better that record. They're 18 games below .500 right now.

I enjoy seeing the Astros beat up on teams like the Angels who thought they'd be pushovers, but it happens.

 

o

 

12 games is not even 1/10 of the season.

36 games is almost 1/4 of the season.

The OP of the thread is about how the Astros' front office sees a bright future for the team, in spite of their horrible overall record this year.

The point of the thread (and my last post) is not that the Astros will climb back into the 2013 playoff race, it's that they have been a competent team for a significant stretch of this season, which could be a sign of things to come in 2015, 2016, and beyond (as their owner and their GM believe that it is.)

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

That is a really good read.

“You look at how other organizations have done it, they’ve tried to maintain a .500 level as they prepare to be good in the future,” says Luhnow. “That path is probably necessary in some markets. But it takes 10 years. Our fans have already been on this decline, from 2006 to 2011. It’s not like we’re starting fresh.
Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough division for them. Tougher than the East.

True. I think the AL West is going to dominate for several years. The future looks interesting because the team with the worst farm system in the division (Angels) is the biggest spender, although Seattle can throw some coin around too. Oakland is... Oakland, and Texas is suffering from a lull but has very good prospects in their own right.

The two frontrunners for the MVP award (Trout, Donaldson) are both young and in the West. The top three players in salary (Cano, Fielder, Pujols) are in the West. It's a harsh landscape facing the Astros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Hernandez was coming off of a 107 OPS+, I think teams might have been reluctant he was falling off. The last time Santander had an OPS+ under 120 was in 2021.
    • He's hit more HRs in the past 3 years than any switch hitter in baseball and doesn't kill you in the field. His getting a QO was never in doubt. Not even in May.
    • I'm telling you why he should be moved (to the minors or in a trade) now, especially because there are superior replacement options on the major league roster and in the minors that can be more productive than him, as well as make the 26-man roster more versatile. It's perfectly reasonable for us to disagree on the timing on when the team will or should move on from Hays, and you're most likely correct that it will most likely be this offseason. But because I want the team to win a World Series this season, I hope they move on from him now/ASAP. Unfortunately, because of Elias's track record with even worse players such as Rougned Odor, Adam Frazier, Aaron Hicks, Ryan McKenna, and Jorge Mateo, I do think it'll be much later than I'd want. And, in my opinion, it's going to be to the detriment of the team. Another thing to consider - you point out that Hays has an OPS over .800 against lefties in 2024 at the moment. I don't think it's reasonable to consider that to be sustainable to due Hays' own career splits. Hays has a career OPS against lefties of .788. So it's reasonable to expect Hays to wind up close to that number by the end of this season. Even if Hays settles at .800 OPS against lefties as his final line, that'll mean he's likely going to be slashing an OPS of below .725ish (maybe less, I'm not great with math on the fly) the rest of the way to wind up there. That's not really any kind of significant platoon advantage to be benching Kjerstad in particular. The other reason it's reasonable to expect Hays' OPS against lefties to regress is that, just as Hays has a pronounced favorable career split against LHP, he also has a pronounced unfavorable career split in the second half. For his career, Hays has hit .242/.296/.710 in the second half, for a tOPS+ of 90. So Hays in the second half has been 10 percent worse than his total career OPS. That makes sense given Hays is an injury prone player and tends to play through nagging injuries, leading to diminished production at the plate.  Hays is/has been playing hurt. So it's not good baseball to stick with him and merely hope for the best, or to expect for him to continue overperforming considering his talent level, underlying metrics, and his career production. Its best to move on quickly to the younger options the team has available to replace him. 
    • Teoscar Hernandez seems like the good comp for what type of salary he would get though the year he having hitting might pass that.  Hernandez took a 1 year deal for 23.5 million for little bounce back deal.  
    • Elias is talking to everyone. Just like pretty much everyone else.
    • This same reporter tweeted that the Orioles are also in on Skubal. Is he also in the dumpster?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...